The crisis in the monarchyLetter from Bob Edwards in Harlow
As Marxists we’ve often argued that the expense of the monarchy is maintained by the capitalist class to provide a safety net. It was rolled out in Australia when the Royal Preroragive was used to kick out Gough Whitlam, the Labour Prime Minister. That was a precedent to test the public reaction.
So for the capitalist class it is handy to the keep the monarchy above criticism. There was a minor crisis over the death of Princess Diana (the “annus horribilis”), but a bigger crisis is brewing now over Andrew, and so he will have to be sacrificed to keep the royal image ‘wholesome’.

But I smell a conspiracy. Andrew could have been exposed years ago – remember the late Queen forked out £10mn to close down a legal action against him. But what concerns me now is the timing. Why now?
Occasionally snippets slip out on radio news or TV news, for instance that millions go into the royal treasury as the Sovereign Grant. The Crown estates are worth over £16bn and 15% of the proceeds from this – including payment for wind-turbines on the ‘royal’ sea-bed – go directly to the monarchy. In 2017 this was increased to 25% of the profits for ten years, to pay for repairs to Buckingham Palace.
No-one seems to mention the fact that the monarch (and his heir) have the right to go through parliamentary legislation – all behind closed doors, of course so the public are never told – to sift through (and possibly amend) any clauses that might affect them.
So reducing Andrew back to the ranks (as if) is just a smokescreen and a distraction from the role of the royals and their huge appetite for wealth. It is amazing how greed can be bred into the genes, along with a low IQ!
What huge landed estates are in the hands of the major and minor royals is all ultimately a product of wars and conflicts in the Middle Ages, land, titles and wealth plundered from one another and from ordinary people.
We’d be all far better off if this property and wealth belonged to the state, so it can be used to fund schools, hospitals and care homes. The royals can get jobs as tour guides around their former homes and estates.
[Feature picture and Andrew picture from Wikimedia Commons, here]
- For a People’s Budget! No to Austerity! - Meeting Report from Mark Langabeer, Newton Abbot Labour Member Over 1000 people attended a zoom meeting on March 1st, organised as part of Arise –
- Irish commission on Mother and Baby homes – what will happen to the oral testimony tapes? - Letter from Professor Soairse Nic Gabhainn, University of Galway Further to the scandal concerning the mother and baby homes in Ireland, it now turns out
- Starmer/Progress – same lack of ‘vision’ - LETTER from Peter Doyle, Penrith and the Borders CLP member Starmer’s insipid speech last week reminded me of a Progress meeting I attended a few
- NHS re-organistion and centralisation - LETTER from Ray McHale While I agree with the thrust and conclusions of this [website] article, some of the specifics (perhaps flowing from Alison Pollocks
- Britain’s high-end housing boom - LETTER from Mark Langabeer, Newton Abbot Labour member Doing the rounds on social media, there is a picture of over two hundred people queuing at
Letters Archive
- Royals for hire - By Mark Langabeer (Hastings and Rye CLP) Channel 4’s investigative programme, Dispatches (Monday, 10th May) delved into the murky world of royals profiting from their
- Democracy under attack! - LETTER from Tom Smith – Newport West Labour Party Member The state can be defined, in the last analysis, as armed bodies of men. As far
- For a People’s Budget! No to Austerity! - Meeting Report from Mark Langabeer, Newton Abbot Labour Member Over 1000 people attended a zoom meeting on March 1st, organised as part of Arise –
- Irish commission on Mother and Baby homes – what will happen to the oral testimony tapes? - Letter from Professor Soairse Nic Gabhainn, University of Galway Further to the scandal concerning the mother and baby homes in Ireland, it now turns out
- Starmer/Progress – same lack of ‘vision’ - LETTER from Peter Doyle, Penrith and the Borders CLP member Starmer’s insipid speech last week reminded me of a Progress meeting I attended a few
